<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Online Marketing Services &#38; Business Website Design &#187; screen resolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://om4.com.au/tag/screen-resolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://om4.com.au</link>
	<description>Find customers. Convert online.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Screen Resolutions and Web Page Widths &#8211; April 2009</title>
		<link>http://om4.com.au/screen-resolutions-and-web-page-widths-april-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://om4.com.au/screen-resolutions-and-web-page-widths-april-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Graphic Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen resolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://om4.com.au/?p=941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve noticed quite a sharp change in screen resolutions from the Analytics logs on various sites.
The number of people using 800&#215;600 resolution monitors or lower has got to the point where in most cases this segment can safely be ignored. 
If you are designing for a minimum resolution of 1,024 px wide (which translates to [...]<p><br/><br/><a href="http://om4.com.au/screen-resolutions-and-web-page-widths-april-2009/">Screen Resolutions and Web Page Widths &#8211; April 2009</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed quite a sharp change in screen resolutions from the Analytics logs on various sites.</p>
<p>The number of people using 800&#215;600 resolution monitors or lower has got to the point where in most cases this segment can safely be ignored. </p>
<p>If you are designing for a minimum resolution of 1,024 px wide (which translates to a 984px wide web page layout, once you allow for scroll bars etc), perhaps 2 to 3% of your visitors might encounter the dreaded horizontal scrollbars.  Not many. And if you are running a business website, are you that concerned with visitors who have such old technology?</p>
<p>Looking ahead, the next significant screen resolution to consider is 1,280 px wide. If you designed for this width, more than a third of your visitors would need to scroll horizontally &#8211; not good. So we are probably going to see 984 px width web designs the maximum width for a while.</p>
<p>Based on my set of stats, the following table shows the the main screen resolutions and the % of visitors who would need to scroll horizontally if you designed for this width:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Screen Width (px)</td>
<td>% Requiring Horizontal Scroll</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>320</td>
<td>0.01%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>800</td>
<td>0.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1,024</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1,280</td>
<td>38.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1,440</td>
<td>61.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1,680</td>
<td>75.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1,920</td>
<td>91.3%</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Down at the 320px level we are looking at the iPhone platform, and different rules apply here. Designing business websites for the iPhone platform means using a separate website, quite possibly yourdomain.mobi, so buy your domain if you can. </p>
<p><br/><br/><a href="http://om4.com.au/screen-resolutions-and-web-page-widths-april-2009/">Screen Resolutions and Web Page Widths &#8211; April 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://om4.com.au/screen-resolutions-and-web-page-widths-april-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
